Polished AI Outputs. Weaker Work Ethic.

Can you still tell the difference between true efficiency and the gradual erosion of judgment?

AI is now threaded through almost every aspect of professional work. It drafts, summarises, reframes, prioritises, prepares. AI has already saved me days of work! Used well, it genuinely elevates the quality of thinking that leaders bring to the table. Used poorly, it does something far more subtle and far more dangerous because it dulls discernment whilst giving the illusion of competence.

At its best, AI acts like a thinking partner. It helps you to prepare more thoroughly, stress-test an argument, or sharpen your language once the thinking is already sound. In those moments, it doesn’t replace judgment because the leader remains fully present, curious and engaged. AI accelerates the work, but the thinking still belongs to the human.

At its worst, AI becomes a proxy for thinking rather than a support for it. The output looks too polished, too well-structured, and when you scratch beneath the surface you’ll see that there is very little substance holding it all together. The logic hasn’t been questioned, the assumptions haven’t been challenged, and the values that should underpin the work are strangely absent. What remains is something that sounds right but carries no real weight.

Neuroscience offers a useful perspective here because the brain is, by design, an energy-conserving system. The prefrontal cortex (the part responsible for judgment, reasoning, ethical reflection and complex decision-making) is metabolically expensive. When an external system offers you ready-made answers, your brain is relieved of that cost. From there it’s easy to default, often unconsciously, to cognitive offloading, and over time (ie., through repetition) this can shift us from active discernment to passive acceptance.

So then the risk is not that AI makes us less intelligent. The risk is that it makes us less deliberate because we forget to pause and ask, do I actually agree with this?

You can usually see the difference very quickly, even if it’s hard to put your finger on it at first. It shows up in the quality of the questions being asked and leaders who are thinking deeply may use AI to generate better questions, not fewer. It shows up in whether someone can explain, calmly and clearly, how they reached their conclusion. And it shows up most visibly in whether a person can confidently put their name to the work without being vague or deflecting.

There is though an ethical dimension that matters more than many people realise. Values, professional standards and work ethic are not embedded automatically in AI outputs. They have to be brought to the interaction by the user. When we lean too heavily on external systems we can begin to externalise responsibility as well thereby distancing ourselves from ownership, accountability and moral clarity. Over time, and as the research shows us, that behaviour can quickly become a habit.

AI will only ever reflect the standard you bring to it because it will mirror your depth, your curiosity, or indeed your shortcuts.

This is why two people can use the same tools and produce radically different outcomes.

One uses AI as a scaffold for thinking, the other as a substitute for it. One remains anchored in judgment, the other slowly gives it away.

Fast and easy can feel helpful, especially in pressured environments. But fast and easy is also fast and easy for others to recognise. Senior leaders, boards and hiring panels are becoming remarkably adept at sensing when work doesn’t belong to the person presenting it. The polish gives it away. So too does the absence of conviction (if you have ever worked with me you’ll know the importance I place on you understanding your “why”).

So if you’re using AI in your daily work do you still pay attention to your values, your standards and your capacity to think, even when it’s so tempting to rely on something not human?

If anything, efficiency should sharpen your judgment. Without that, the progress you believe you’re making is ultimately worthless.

---

If this has prompted reflection on how judgment, values and decision-making are showing up in your team, we can explore that together.

A COHESION strategy is grounded in neuroscience, emotional intelligence, and the lived realities of modern leadership, with the aim of creating conditions where teams think clearly and perform consistently under pressure.

Simply choose a time from my calendar and we'll take it from there : https://bit.ly/Teams-With-Gwyneth